Skip to main content

Music trackers were once the go-to tool for digital musicians in the late 80s and early 90s. These compact programs let artists build sample-based tracks that revolutionised sound creation in demoscene, video games, and experimental music. Trackers thrived in an era when studio time was costly, giving home producers a way to create sample-based music on their own. Yet, limited memory and storage made digital music production challenging. These constraints, however, fuelled creativity, pushing artists to make small, efficient files that maximised hardware capabilities. As CD-ROM storage emerged, making file sizes less of a concern, trackers gradually faded into the background as newer technologies took over.

Today, trackers are back. Thanks to new software and hardware tools like Renoise, Polyend Tracker+, Polyend Tracker Mini, Nerdseq and Dirtywave M8. These tools have sparked a new wave of appreciation, allowing musicians to rediscover the efficiency, precision, and programming-like creativity that trackers offer.

The Golden Era of Trackers

Trackers emerged in the late 1980s, hitting their peak in the 90s as digital sound capabilities grew. They allowed musicians to create complex music using small samples that could be sequenced and manipulated. These tools were favoured by early game developers and creators of complex visual and sound shows designed to push hardware to its limits.

Trackers truly began with Ultimate Soundtracker, created by Karsten Obarski in 1987. Obarski took the Amiga’s sound capabilities and developed a tool that made sample-based music creation accessible to a wider audience. Ultimate Soundtracker allowed users to create complex music by sequencing and manipulating small samples—a huge innovation for home musicians and game developers.

However, the demoscene community quickly embraced and pirated Ultimate Soundtracker, spawning a wave of variations and improvements on Obarski’s software. Enhanced programs like ProTracker and OctaMED emerged, pushing the Amiga’s sound to its absolute limits. 

One of the key innovations that made trackers so influential was the introduction of the .MOD file format. This format stored not only the music samples but also the sequencing data, allowing entire songs to be shared easily across the Amiga community. Musicians could listen to others’ tracks, dissect the structure, and learn new tracker techniques from the song data itself. This made .MOD files a powerful tool for collaborative learning and experimentation users could see exactly how each track was built, gaining insights into effects, sample usage, and sequencing methods. This open exchange of music files and techniques fuelled rapid innovation, helping tracker software like ProTracker and OctaMED evolve and expand in functionality.

In trackers, vertical sequencing provided a unique way to arrange sound, enabling a clear view of mixes and sample interactions. This setup was ideal for low-memory environments, making trackers the perfect choice for soundtracks in games and demo scene projects. The clear efficiency of trackers also fit well with the Technology Adoption Life Cycle. They served as innovative tools during a time when the gap between professional and consumer audio production was miles apart.

But as CDs replaced floppy disks, storage limitations eased and computers could play stereo audio. Trackers lost ground to DAWs (Digital Audio Workstations) with computer audio as that offered greater memory and processing flexibility to enable live recording and playing sample audio.

The Cyclical Nature of Technology: Old Ideas, New Relevance

The Technology Adoption Curve describes how new ideas spread over time, but this curve is often cyclical, with old technologies finding new life as they adapt to modern needs. As new tools emerge, older ideas resurface with fresh appeal and innovative applications. Trackers have experienced this cycle firsthand. Just as vinyl records made a comeback for their “authentic” sound, trackers are now valued for their unique workflow and programming-like approach to music creation.

Today, tools like Polyend Tracker+, Polyend Tracker Mini, and Dirtywave M8 offer modern twists on classic tracker systems, streamlining the tracker workflow with portability and power. Musicians are rediscovering the precise control trackers offer over each element of a track and the freedom to experiment with complex rhythms and sounds that traditional DAWs often are difficult to replicate.

Trackers in Early Games: Interactive Sound in a Compact Package

Early video games and demoscene productions used tracker formats because of their efficiency. Rather than a large, pre-mixed audio file, tracker files held sample data and playback instructions, letting sound engines create music on-the-fly. The music could even interact dynamically with in-game events, something that modern game engines tend to overlook by converting tracker files to standard stereo formats.

The potential for real-time, interactive music makes trackers highly relevant today, especially as new audio techniques like spatial audio and interactive soundscapes gain attention. When trackers play files as they were designed, it creates a level of immersion and customisation that’s difficult to match in standard stereo soundscapes.

Bringing Trackers into the Modern Audio World

In modern game design, there’s enormous potential in revisiting tracker-style interactivity. Imagine spatial audio that dynamically shifts, echoes, and evolves based on real-time actions within a game, or music that adjusts its complexity depending on player engagement. Trackers’ pattern-based sequencing is inherently suited to this approach, offering a unique opportunity for interactive, adaptive music.

Reintroducing trackers into sound engines that enable “music on-the-fly” playback over rendering .mods to a stereo sound file can allow players and designers to experience non-linear music in a fresh way, bringing the caricature sound design of the tracker workflow. Just as we’re now exploring VR and AR soundscapes, interactive tracker files could bring a sense of living, breathing music to digital experiences. By allowing tracker files to play naturally, without conversion, developers could unlock new soundscapes that respond to players’ every move.

Why Trackers Deserve a Place in Today’s Audio Landscape

The revival of trackers is more than nostalgia; it’s about embracing the creative possibilities that these tools offer. They bridge programming and music creation, encourage efficiency, and promote real-time interactivity and unique methods to play music. By bringing trackers back into the fold with modern tools like Polyend Tracker and Dirtywave M8, artists and developers can create music that not only sounds different but behaves differently. For game developers, artists, and audio enthusiasts, trackers offer a window into a sound design process that’s uniquely interactive and deeply responsive. 

Making trackers great again isn’t about revisiting the past; it’s about reimagining music’s landscape of the future.

Thank you for reading, and if you found a part of this useful. Share so it can help others.

Also go come check out my channel on YouTube

See you over on YouTube
Aisjam

Author Aisjam

More posts by Aisjam

Leave a Reply